[There are spoilers ahead for this week’s Handmaid’s Tale. If you haven’t watched yet, come back to this post another time!]
The theme of this week’s Handmaid’s Tale seemed to be letting the bad guys absolutely have it. June was, of course, propelling most of this. She not only forced Emily to confront an old enemy, but she herself kept her streak of confrontation going by testifying at a hearing for Fred Waterford. It was extremely cathartic to watch June recount, in front of a judge, all the ways he terrorized her. But there seemed to be one major plot hole in Fred’s legal strategy.
Fans on Reddit thought that was somewhat humorous that Fred and Serena are being represented by a feminine lawyer. Particularly as a result of girls in Gilead aren’t even allowed to learn. In reality, Fred’s personal spouse bought a finger minimize off for studying in entrance of a bunch of males, and he supported it! So why would he now be completely right down to have a feminine lawyer? I imagine it’s important to learn a guide or two to have the ability to be a practising lawyer. Do his backwards-ass views on girls all of the sudden go away when he crosses the Canadian border? Make it make sense!
It might be a intelligent hiring tactic to get the jury to imagine Fred is much less sexist than June is portray him to be. Like, if he employed a feminine lawyer, how dangerous may he actually be? Or, it is potential this can turn out to be a speaking level throughout cross examination. It is also potential he did not decide the lawyer himself?? However that appears unlikely. Both manner, it’s going to be very attention-grabbing to see how the present handles this (in the event that they deal with it in any respect).
This content material is created and maintained by a 3rd occasion, and imported onto this web page to assist customers present their electronic mail addresses. You might be able to discover extra details about this and comparable content material at piano.io